Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!oliveb!intelca!mipos3!nate
From: nate@mipos3.intel.com (Nate Hess)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: shells by the C shore
Message-ID: <2250@mipos3.intel.com>
Date: 18 May 88 20:49:15 GMT
References: <2599@usceast.UUCP> <2601@usceast.UUCP> <4065@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Reply-To: nate@mipos3.intel.com (Nate Hess)
Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 15

In article <4065@gryphon.CTS.COM> sarima@gryphon.CTS.COM (Stan Friesen) writes:
>I find I use that capability in csh more than I use the editing
>capability. Certainly the *editing* capability in the Korn Shell is
>very nice.

I have the history capability of csh combined with the line-editing
capability of Emacs, available with tcsh.  I find that I use both
history and line-editing rather frequently.  A shell without either
really slows me down.

--woodstock
-- 
	   "How did you get your mind to tilt like your hat?"

...!{decwrl|hplabs!oliveb|pur-ee|qantel|amd}!intelca!mipos3!nate
<domainish> :   nate@mipos3.intel.com		ATT :    (408) 765-4309