Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!gatech!mcnc!duke!ndd
From: ndd@duke.cs.duke.edu (Ned Danieley)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Ksh use (was Re: Should ``csh'' be part of ...)
Message-ID: <11753@duke.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 19 May 88 13:06:44 GMT
References: <2599@usceast.UUCP> <2601@usceast.UUCP> <4095@mtgzz.UUCP> <11747@duke.cs.duke.edu> <8066@elsie.UUCP>
Reply-To: ndd@duke.UUCP (Ned D. Danieley)
Organization: Duke University, Durham NC
Lines: 27
Posted: Thu May 19 09:06:44 1988

In article <8066@elsie.UUCP> ado@elsie.UUCP (Arthur David Olson) writes:
>> As long as we're talking about ksh, is there any way to do job
>> control without typing fg (and bg)? In csh
>> %2
>> brings the second stopped job into the foreground; as I understand it,
>> in ksh I have to do
>> fg %2
>
>As someone who made the switch from csh to ksh a while back. . .
>
>	alias %1='fg %1'
...
>-- 
>    Canada's program is to spaceflight as the carrier pigeon is to mail.
>	ado@ncifcrf.gov			ADO is a trademark of Ampex.




Oh... (slowly rising flush). That wasn't so hard, was it? Thanks.



Ned Danieley (ndd@sunbar.mc.duke.edu)
Basic Arrhythmia Laboratory
Box 3140, Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC  27710
(919) 684-6807 or 684-6942