Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!cgch!cgcha!wwtz
From: wwtz@cgcha.uucp (Wolfgang Wetz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?
Keywords: csh==Berkeley shell, should it be in System V or not?
Message-ID: <632@cgch.UUCP>
Date: 19 May 88 15:13:06 GMT
References: <2599@usceast.UUCP> <2601@usceast.UUCP> <4095@mtgzz.UUCP>
Sender: news@cgch.UUCP
Reply-To: wwtz@cgcha.UUCP (Wolfgang Wetz)
Organization: CIBA-GEIGY AG, FO/WIRZ/WRZ, CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland
Lines: 10

In article <4095@mtgzz.UUCP> avr@mtgzz.UUCP (XMRP50000[jcm]-a.v.reed) writes:
>
>Why would any sane person wish to use csh when they can use ksh?
>
>					Adam Reed (mtgzz!avr)

perhaps because the ksh writes back to disk the whole history file after
each <return>.

Wolfgang Wetz   (..!mcvax!cernvax!cgch!wwtz)