Xref: utzoo news.admin:2232 news.groups:3853 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!purdue!gatech!udel!cranor From: cranor@udel.EDU (Chuck Cranor) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups Subject: Re: Binary groups need their own hierarchy Message-ID: <2638@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 19 May 88 16:26:56 GMT References: <397@pan.UUCP> <215@chem.ucsd.EDU> Reply-To: cranor@udel.EDU (Chuck Cranor) Followup-To: news.admin Organization: University of Delaware Lines: 19 In article <215@chem.ucsd.EDU> jwp@chem.ucsd.edu (John Pierce) writes: >In article <397@pan.UUCP> jw@pan.UUCP (Jamie Watson) writes: > > > > .... putting binaries in their own hierarchy, bin.*, would require specific > > action to *receive* them, rather than to block them.... >That's an excellent suggestion. I agree! Then we'd see who *really* wants to tote around all those huge binary postings. I wonder what kind of propagation the biniary groups would get then?? Chuck [UDel News Admin] -- Chuck Cranor University of Delaware PHONE: (302)-451-6660 (UDel), (302)-737-5852 (home) ARPA: cranor@udel.EDU, UUCP: ...!!udel.edu!cranor "I'd like to see John the Baptist's impersonation of Graham Hill." - R.J. Gumby