Xref: utzoo news.admin:2260 news.groups:3919
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!killer!pollux!dalsqnt!rpp386!pigs!haugj
From: haugj@pigs.UUCP (John F. Haugh II)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups
Subject: Re: Binary groups need their own hierarchy
Summary: Then I move for a two week discussion period.
Message-ID: <128@pigs.UUCP>
Date: 20 May 88 19:58:37 GMT
References: <397@pan.UUCP> <678@vsi.UUCP>
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers
Lines: 23

In article <678@vsi.UUCP>, sullivan@vsi.UUCP (Michael T Sullivan) writes:
> In article <397@pan.UUCP>, jw@pan.UUCP (Jamie Watson) writes:
> > By
> > putting binaries in their own hierarchy, bin.*, it would require specific
> > action to *receive* them, rather than to block them.
> 
> I second this motion, vigorously!
> -- 
> Michael Sullivan		{uunet|attmail}!vsi!sullivan

a motion having been made and seconded for the creation of a separate
hierarchy for binary groups, i move for a two week discussion period
prior to the (hopefully) collection of votes.

and as someone else said, once these have been spun off, let's see
what kind of propagation they receive then!

- john.
-- 
 The Beach Bum                                 Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers
 UUCP: ...!killer!rpp386!jfh                          jfh@rpp386.uucp :SMAILERS

 "You are in a twisty little maze of UUCP connections, all alike" -- fortune