Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!husc6!think!ames!amdcad!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!munnari!munnari.oz!kre
From: kre@munnari.oz (Robert Elz)
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: What "cancel" really does (was: squelch control message)
Summary: Grunge .. foiled again...
Keywords: cancel, squelch, Supersedes:
Message-ID: <2133@munnari.oz>
Date: 21 May 88 06:51:25 GMT
References: <279@comdesign.UUCP> <2124@munnari.oz> <2115@epimass.EPI.COM>
Sender: news@munnari.oz
Lines: 9

In article <2115@epimass.EPI.COM>, jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) writes:
> But Robert [that's me .. kre] is incorrect in assuming that the cancel
> message is then passed to downstream sites; it isn't.

Joe is right, beats me how I managed to miss that.  Now I guess I should
go back through ancient news sources and see from where I picked up the
wrong assumption.

kre