Xref: utzoo comp.mail.misc:999 comp.mail.uucp:1299 news.sysadmin:672
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ihnp4!chinet!les
From: les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.uucp,news.sysadmin
Subject: Re: I do *NOT* forward AT&T Mail messages (AT&T mail is a premium service)
Keywords: attmail, mail, email, $$$, money
Message-ID: <5575@chinet.UUCP>
Date: 12 May 88 17:39:35 GMT
References: <356@icus.UUCP> <4369@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Reply-To: les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 14

In article <4369@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> barnett@steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett) writes:
>...
>attmail	 icus(DEMAND)			# AT&T Mail calls on demand
>If this is a pay service, I suggest you don't advertise to the world
>such a connection. You should have a private and public map.

But the maps only control what the automatic routers will do.  There would
still be nothing to prevent neighoring sites from using bang paths to
force the routing (not to imply that anyone would do such a thing).  This
problem is likely to become serious as more commercial services are
available for uucp connections.  Does sendmail allow forwarding rules to
depend on the sender?

  Les Mikesell