Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:2575 comp.sys.mac:16567
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!chinet!mcdchg!motsj1!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!cadovax!jason
From: jason@cadovax.UUCP (Jason Reispafweb)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Wrong group
Keywords: Rado watches with diamond dials
Message-ID: <2117@cadovax.UUCP>>
Date: 26 May 88 17:05:53 GMT
References: <3363@gryphon.CTS.COM> <1988Apr18.134147.2834@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <3459@gryphon.CTS.COM><609@eplrx7.UUCP>
Reply-To: jason@cadovax.UUCP (Jason Reispafweb)
Organization: Contel Business Systems, Torrance, CA.
Lines: 32


In article <609@eplrx7.UUCP>, lad@eplrx7.UUCP (Lawrence A. Deleski) writes:

>J'ever notice about the only thing this guy Sexton can do is mouth on and on
>about how bad the Mac is at anything versus an Amiga.  No fact to back up
>his dribble,  just one common underlying message,  whatever the Mac can do
>the Amiga can do it cheaper and better.  
>
>In an email barrage from him I was preached to by this guy about how bad the
>Mac II is at animation,  graphics,  etc.  I purposely went back over this
>newsgroup just to convince myself that is just wasn't me he was assulting.
>Well,  I'm convinced,  this guy's a loon.  Every article he posts contains
>at least one derrogatory remark about the Mac,  and several examples of how
>his cheap little Amiga can out-animate,  etc.,  etc.,  the Mac.  

I cannot see the reasoning behind posting personal attacks to comp.graphics,
where this first appeared.

For the record, I have a Mac ][, and consider the Amiga a much better
choice for Animation, given the hardware assist; preferable over
"brute forcing it" anyday.

The mac is easier to learn, and is, in general a more simple machine. I
for one, am glad the mouse only has one button.

Mr. Deleski: do you always escalate email wars to net postings ?

Please, in the future, restain yourself to alt.flame, or email.

Thank you.
Jason.