Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!jeff From: jeff@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Stearns) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Do FastPaths isolate broadcasts? Message-ID: <3868@fluke.COM> Date: 26 May 88 00:48:37 GMT Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM Lines: 46 I have an existing Ethernet with about 100 hosts. I'm considering the addition of ten or so FastPaths to our Macs and PC's can run TOPS or AppleShare and be served by our UNIX hosts. It would look something like this simplified diagram: UNIX UNIX UNIX UNIX ( ~~ Vitalink bridge ~~~ ) hosts hosts hosts hosts | to distant nets || || || || | || || || || | [bridges to]==== ===========================================================[ other ]==== || || || [Ethernets ]==== [Fastpath] [Fastpath] [Fastpath] | | | | | | | | | +Mac +Mac +Mac | | | +Mac +Mac +Mac | | | +Mac +Mac +Mac | | | +Mac +Mac +Mac Question 1: AppleTalk protocols emit LOTS of broadcast packets at boot time. Will those broadcasts pass through the FastPath and pollute our extended Ethernet? Question 2: If so, can the concept of Zones be applied to control this in any way? How about configuring each FastPath with a different network number (or is this a foregone conclusion...)? Question 3: If the FastPaths were replaced by Cayman GatorBoxes, would the broadcast situation be changed in any way? Thanks for any experience and advice! -- Jeff Stearns Domain: jeff@tc.fluke.COM Voice: +1 206 356 5064 If you must: {uw-beaver,microsoft,sun}!fluke!jeff USPS: John Fluke Mfg. Co. / P.O. Box C9090 / Everett WA 98206