Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!root
From: root@cca.ucsf.edu (Computer Center)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: Patch #5 for Pcomm v1.0
Summary: Bug posting should _always_ include identification of their base
Message-ID: <1271@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>
Date: 27 May 88 23:41:52 GMT
References: <13900001@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Computer Center, UCSF
Lines: 21

In article <13900001@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu>, hood@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
> 
> This is Patch #5 to the Pcomm version 1.0 distribution package.

Well, I would probably like to have this program available but I have
no idea from the posting where to find it.

Now what coach?

Bug and discussion postings should _always_ include a sufficient
reference to identify the program and indicate where it was posted.

Thos Sumner       (thos@cca.ucsf.edu)   BITNET:  thos@ucsfcca
(The I.G.)        (...ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf!thos)

OS|2 -- an Operating System for puppets.

#include <disclaimer.std>

P.S. In this case, I finally found it by looking for the file name
(not found in the subject line, by the way) in the comp.sources.unix
archive.