Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!pnet02!bilbo
From: bilbo@pnet02.cts.com (Bill Daggett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Commodore Flame  (One Blue and One Brown Eye)
Message-ID: <4201@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Date: 26 May 88 05:20:37 GMT
Sender: root@gryphon.CTS.COM
Organization: People-Net [pnet02], Redondo Beach, CA.
Lines: 30

papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
>In article <1239@ektools.UUCP> barrett@ektools.UUCP (Chris Barrett) writes:
>>In article <4085@killer.UUCP>, elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green) writes:
>[deleted junk]
>
>This stuff has NO place in a .tech group.  Discuss this in comp.sys.amiga,
>PLEASE!!!!
>
>-- Marco Papa 'Doc'  [flame-retardant suit on :-)]

Yo Marco,

This is comp.sys.amiga now!  You cross posted.  Grin!
But I wish the moderator of comp.sys.amiga.tech would make himself known once
in awhile and straighten out the intent not only what is suppose to be posted
on .tech but the specific type of technical subjects it was designed for.  It
is my understanding that .tech is not for POLLs or for CBM Flames but rather
for future development programming (technical) matters.  I don't agree exactly
with the .tech title because one with any technical question might think .tech
would be a good place to post it.  I don't know if there is a watch dog for
.tech but a couple "bull dogs" have chased me off twice in the past.  Now I
just post everything here in comp.sys.amiga.  Is there a region of USENET that
lists and defines exactly the intent of the different "groups"?

Bill

UUCP: {ihnp4!scgvaxd!cadovax rutgers!marque}!gryphon!pnet02!bilbo
INET: bilbo@pnet02.cts.com
* Sometimes The Dragon Wins! * Still looking for the best Amiga BBS
software to resurrect Bilbo's Hideaway on - but not holding breath!