Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:312 comp.sys.ibm.pc:15923
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bu-cs!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!iuvax!bobmon
From: bobmon@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (RAMontante)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Source code for shar for pc's
Message-ID: <9141@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 26 May 88 16:59:07 GMT
References: <1555@bu-tyng.bu.edu> <3186@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: bobmon@iuvax.UUCP (RAMontante)
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Indiana University
Lines: 20

dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>
>Better still, we need comp.sources.msdos.  Why doesn't somebody propose
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I would like to propose, instead, that comp.binaries.ibm.pc become
	comp.code.msdos.
The msdos world has less reason to distinguish between source and executable
than the Unix world.  Begging the cost-to-post issue, I would be inclined to
post my super-neato-utility in a package that included binary for those poor
souls without the correct compiler, AND source for those who can make use of it.

If this really is a terrible idea (impossible!:-), then as second choice I will

	propose comp.sources.msdos	(and let OS/2 hang!)

If this means I've agreed to collect votes for either or both of these groups,
someboddy please tell me what it is I have to do.

-Bob Montante