Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!csun!polyslo!dorourke
From: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP (David O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: The FullWrite 1 Meg controversy
Keywords: FullWrite
Message-ID: <2977@polyslo.UUCP>
Date: 30 May 88 19:38:29 GMT
References: <2120@ur-tut.UUCP> <54570@sun.uucp> <14428@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: dorourke@polyslo.UUCP (David O'Rourke)
Distribution: na
Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo
Lines: 15

In article <14428@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> verber@apatosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Verber) writes:
>Something I found interesting though was the fact that the same document had
>no problems on my MacPlus at work.  Looks like FW was specifically shoehorned
>into a MacPlus.

  No a basic Mac II uses more system memory than a Mac Plus, you have less
availible memory on a 1 meg Mac II, than you do on a Mac Plus.  Try it sometime
look at the system heap on a striped system on a II and a Plus, you'll find
the plus uses less memory.


-- 
David M. O'Rourke

Disclaimer: I don't represent the school.  All opinions are mine!