Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!umd5!mimsy!chris
From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: `open systems': no one can agree...
Message-ID: <11671@mimsy.UUCP>
Date: 25 May 88 17:12:10 GMT
References: <5412@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <3166@pdn.UUCP> <3c3fdf1b.4bee@apollo.uucp>
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 8

I get the feeling that every single person who has posted an opinion
about OSF has a different definition of an `open system'.  So:  Just
what *is* an `open system'?  What makes a system `open'?

In any case, the obvious thing to do about OSF is to wait and see.
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris@mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris