Xref: utzoo comp.windows.x:3527 comp.windows.news:525 comp.unix.questions:7270 comp.unix.microport:730 comp.unix.xenix:2338
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe
From: keithe@tekgvs.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.windows.news,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.microport,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: answers to "is there X (or NeWS) for SV/386?"
Keywords: X Windows, NeWS, System V/386, Interactive, 80386, Unix
Message-ID: <3511@tekgvs.TEK.COM>
Date: 26 May 88 17:58:55 GMT
References: <17161@gatech.edu>
Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.UUCP (Keith Ericson)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 28

In article <17161@gatech.edu> ken@gatech.edu (Ken Seefried iii) writes:
<
<
<Microfield:
<
<Another board that I have seen running X, although it was NOT under
<System V/386. This board was running in a system based on the Opus
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
	See below.

<Series 200PM National Semi 32332 coprocessor (in an AT). The Board DOES
<run System V rel. 3.1, so I see no reason why it won't run for the 386
<(Interactive claims support). I played for a while, and respose was
<resonable. The board is called the P8, and i have no info about the
                                    ^^
	It's a "T8"

<board or the company (other than seeing one and having it recomended by
<two different people). I will be pusuing it, however. The display
<looked like a 1280x1024 in 256 colours.
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Correct (except for the spelling :-) )

<
We have Interactive's vp/ix (a SysV/386) running X on T8's and it
works just fine. Microfield is a local company (probably a Tek spin-off)
and we were peripherally involved in their driver development.

keith