Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:3033 rec.ham-radio:4973 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!jans From: jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio Subject: Re: Re: Low-power TV transmission Message-ID: <2693@tekcrl.TEK.COM> Date: 31 May 88 22:03:44 GMT Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or. Lines: 25 (Discussion about cheap, low power TV transmitters led to:) <> If they are who I think they are, they have good reason to be somewhat secretive. They do not adequately supress the vestigal sideband, and put out a 6MHz-wide signal, rather than 4MHz, so they will not fit in the television allocation for the band plan. Instead, they've plopped the thing on 436, which makes weak-signal types furious, and possibly violates international law and/or FCC regulations. In any event, this device CANNOT be re-crystalled for a "normal" channel without causing interference, and CANNOT be operated north of the "A" line (roughly Seattle to Green Bay) because of international regulations. If I mixed them up with someone else, I apologise. Is this the ~$150 box? It would be difficult to build a 4MHz-wide box at that price. Be suspicious of anything under about $300. :::::: Software Productivity Technologies -- Experiment Manager Project :::::: :::::: Jan Steinman N7JDB Box 500, MS 50-383 (w)503/627-5881 :::::: :::::: jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM Beaverton, OR 97077 (h)503/657-7703 ::::::