Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!scs!spl1!laidbak!att!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!ritcv!ritcsh!steveg
From: steveg@ritcsh.UUCP (in stereo where available)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: looking for low cost data hardware for SUBSPLIT Broad Band
Message-ID: <2714@ritcsh.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jun 88 15:15:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: ritcsh.2714
Reply-To: steveg@ritcsh.UUCP (Steve Good -- ISC)
Organization: Computer Science House @ RIT, Rochester, NY
Lines: 29

After getting more specific information from the Gods above.  I have
found that our Broad Band proposed application will be using a SUBSPLIT.

The reason for the SUBSPLIT is that RIT does not wish to use converter
boxes in the application for the TV part of the cable.  So only 12
stations will be available on the cable feed, 2-6 and 7-13.  Because of
this the SUBSPLIT is the only way we can go.

This would leave us with 5-30 MHz for the reverse channel and to play it
safe we could use 250-450 MHz for data in the forward channel.

Thankyou very much for all the input on various broad band data devices
being used.  Most users that responed are using the Sytec[sp?] hardware.

I do not have any specs for Sytec hardware at this time.  Our local sales
person is getting me some specs.

I was wondering if anyone knows if the Sytec can support reverse channel
in the 5-30 MHz range.


I am looking for low cost ASYNC up to 19,200 service over a SUBSPLIT
broad band system using 5-30 MHz reverse and 250-450 MHz forward.

-- 
   ___      ___     ___   Steve Good       ...uunet!ccicpg!cci632!ritcsh!steveg
|@/o o\@| @/- -\@ @/o o\@ Network Administrator         BITNET%"SNGDCO@RITVAXD"
| \ o / |  / o \   \/-\/  Rochester Institute of Technology       (716)475-2702
 \ --- /  | --- |  /---\  "I hear nothing, I see nothing, I say nothing" Shultz