Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!scs!spl1!laidbak!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!hstbme.mit.edu!xev
From: xev@hstbme.mit.edu (Xev Gittler)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Ignoring Hangups
Message-ID: <5615@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Date: 3 Jun 88 18:18:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: bloom-be.5615
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: xev@hstbme.mit.edu (Xev Gittler)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 9


I know there was a whole discussion on this topic before, but I missed
it. Could someone tell me the reason that elm ignores HUP's at some
points, and mre importantly, is it bad to change it not to ignore
them?

					Xev Gittler
					xev@hstbme.mit.edu, or
					xev@athena.mit.edu