Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!scs!spl1!laidbak!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!killer!tness7!tness1!mechjgh
From: mechjgh@tness1.UUCP (Greg Hackney 214+464-2771)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Elm 2.0 Really the last???
Message-ID: <742@tness1.UUCP>
Date: 3 Jun 88 22:51:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: tness1.742
References: <1043@bellboy.UUCP>
Reply-To: mechjgh@tness1.UUCP (Greg Hackney 214+464-2771)
Organization: Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Network Engineering
Lines: 11

In article <1043@bellboy.UUCP> hack@bellboy.UUCP (I) write:
 
>I just rec'd a copy of the Elm 2.0 beta today. In the
>distribution notes, r$ writes that David Taylor
>says this will probably be the last release of Elm.

Correction. The above comment was in release 1.7, not 2.0. 
2.0 was never officially posted to comp.unix.sources.

-- 
Greg