Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!uh2
From: UH2@PSUVM.BITNET (Lee Sailer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Track buffering.  Was "A Plea..."
Message-ID: <44404UH2@PSUVM>
Date: 7 Jun 88 13:29:55 GMT
References: <2009@sugar.UUCP> <7144@swan.ulowell.edu> <2026@sugar.UUCP> <2762@umd5.umd.edu> <2070@sugar.UUCP> <6180@well.UUCP>
Organization: Penn Sate Erie--School of Business
Lines: 5

Speaking of file systems and such.  A while back it was more or less
established (I think) that track buffering would help floppies, especially
in cases where two processes are both trying to access the disk.

Did anybody ever do anything about this?  Couldn't someone who knew about
devices make up a new trackdisk.device that mostly just buffered tracks and
called the old trackdisk.device (after renaming it, I guess)?