Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!mtunx!mtune!icus!limbic!gil From: gil@limbic.UUCP (Gil Kloepfer Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit Subject: Re: AMAC bugs? Summary: Try to use MAC-65... Message-ID: <135@limbic.UUCP> Date: 8 Jun 88 04:06:11 GMT References: <8806061516.AA03720@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: gil@limbic.UUCP (Gil Kloepfer Jr.) Organization: ICUS Computer Group, Islip, NY Lines: 31 In article <8806061516.AA03720@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> SHAFFERJ@BKNLVMS.BITNET ("Jim Shaffer, Jr.") writes: |>A while ago someone mentioned that there were some serious bugs in the |>Atari Macro Assembler. Since I've just started using it, what are these bugs? Ugh...it has been so long ago that I don't remember them all!! I'll try to recap what I can: 1. AMAC does NOT work under SpartaDOS. They do something tricky with the I/O that most programs don't do. 2. I've seen symbols get "lost" somewhere when you write large programs. By lost I mean they get undefined, etc. Sorry, I can't elaborate further, but I do know I spent many hours pulling my hair out on this one. 3. (not a bug) Larger programs get tedious in the edit..assemble.. run..boot.. cycle. You need to load a separate editor, and AMAC itself isn't small. Unfortunately, these are the major points I can remember. I started using MAC-65 and found it was MUCH easier to use than AMAC. There are a couple of things missing in MAC-65, but assembly time is reduced TREMENDOUSLY using MAC-65, it works under SpartaDOS, it has a built-in editor -- all in all I found using MAC-65 a pleasure. I recommend it over AMAC if at all possible. +------------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ | Gil Kloepfer, Jr. | Net-Address: | | ICUS Computer Group, Systems Dvlp. | {boulder,ihnp4,talcott}!icus!limbic!gil| | P.O. Box 1 | Voice-net: (516) 968-6860 | | Islip Terrace, New York 11752 | Othernet: limbic!gil@icus.UUCP | +------------------------------------+----------------------------------------+