Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!lll-tis!ames!umd5!brl-adm!cmcl2!vx2!spector
From: spector@vx2.GBA.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSC 3.0 (anticipating a dissappointment)
Message-ID: <650032@vx2.GBA.NYU.EDU>
Date: 12 Jun 88 00:49:00 GMT
References: <1084@ssc-bee.ssc-vax.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 20


I agree with memory prices what they are ( which is a POLITCAL PROBLEM
I might add...) that it is a drag to get more memory... but....

Source level debuggers and high quality development environments require
memory.  There's no way around it.  Be glad that the debugger is optional, and
that you can still run LSC without it!    THINK makes a WONDERFUL product,
and they have supported it better than most software companies (for ANY kind 
of machine) support their products ( you see Microsoft on the net supporting
THEIR C compiler?!).

Perhaps we should write our congresspersons about getting the  memory prices
down before we lose our computer industry... then we wont go broke buying
a meg or two for our computers...  

To be fair, I must add that I was lucky enough to have bought memory for my
MacintoshII before prices went through the roof.. 

		DHMS

XYZZYGLORP