Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.editors Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: keyboards Message-ID: <1988Jun13.195851.1729@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <5024@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 88 19:58:51 GMT Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:17019 comp.editors:183 Several pieces of private mail have challenged my assertion that the qwerty (Sholes) keyboard was not designed to slow down the typist. Herewith some excerpts from a 24 Feb 1982 contribution to the Editor- People mailing list by Donald Norman -- a name that should be familiar to anyone who knows anything about computer-human-interaction work: "The Sholes keyboard (aka "qwerty") was designed for a typewriter so as to minimize the jamming of typebars as they moved to the platen. This caused the placement of frequent pairs as far from one another as possible. In fact, this SPEEDS typing because typing on alternate hands is faster than on the same hand (list of references and reprints of papers available on demand: see, for example, Rumelhart & Norman in the next Cognitive Science). This point wasn't appreciated at the time because nobody thought of using all ten fingers, and typing without looking at the keyboard was unheard of... "There have been hundreds of studies comparing Dvorak arrangements with Sholes arrangements. Dvorak fans claim massive improvements in speed... However, experiments done by neutral parties tend to put the improvement around the 5 to 10% range -- not worth the effort... you can get a far greater improvement in typing speed by moving the RETURN key, either to where it can be reached without distorting the hand (say by the left thumb...) or by having automatic RETURNs... "If you want to improve typing speed, don't tinker with the current key layout, but do dramatic re-arrangements [e.g. chord keyboards]." -- "For perfect safety... sit on a fence| Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology and watch the birds." --Wilbur Wright| {ihnp4,decvax,uunet!mnetor}!utzoo!henry