Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!vanvleck!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!randy
From: randy@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu (Randy Orrison)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: phys(2) under sVr3?
Message-ID: <5823@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu>
Date: 11 Jun 88 15:37:56 GMT
References: <16090@brl-adm.ARPA> <48300009@hcx3> <11921@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: randy@umn-cs.UUCP (Randy Orrison)
Organization: Control Data, Arden Hills, Minnesota
Lines: 19

In article <11921@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
|>The second advantage is one of consistency (at least for Sys V types).
|Of course, mmap is consistent under SunOS (and someday 4BSD).
and someday SysVR4?  Come on, AT&T&SUN, you can do it!

|If you are stuck with System V's `new and wretched namespace'[*]
|for memory regions, shmbind() is probably appropriate.
Now if only they would fix this, too!

Me, I have great hopes...

|[*]An approximate quote from Dennis Ritchie, I think.
|In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)

	-randy
-- 
Randy Orrison, Control Data, Arden Hills, MN		randy@ux.acss.umn.edu
8-(OSF/Mumblix: Just say NO!)-8	    {ihnp4, seismo!rutgers, sun}!umn-cs!randy
	"I consulted all the sages I could find in Yellow Pages,
	but there aren't many of them."			-APP