Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!mejac!gryphon!greg
From: greg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Greg Laskin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: comp.unix.xenix
Message-ID: <4431@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Date: 12 Jun 88 11:19:55 GMT
References: <25@libove.UUCP> <5087@june.cs.washington.edu>
Reply-To: greg@gryphon.CTS.COM (Greg Laskin)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 14

In article <5087@june.cs.washington.edu> kevinr@uw-june.UUCP (Kevin Ross) writes:
>The XENIX 2.1.4 compiler is very buggy. If I had the money, I would get the
>2.2.1 version, but I don't, so I won't.
>

Very buggy, as opposed to what?  

( 2.2.1 has its own set of bugs as does every compiler for any language.
The bug list for the 2.1.4 compiler was about 4 pages long, with two to
three bugs per page, mostly concerning large model, floating point and
bitfield operations. )

-- 
Greg Laskin  greg@gryphon.CTS.COM    <any backbone site>!gryphon!greg