Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:3069 sci.astro:2204 comp.dcom.modems:1955 comp.misc:2555 rec.ham-radio:5028
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!mtunx!mtuxo!mtgzz!drutx!druin!ldg
From: ldg@druin.ATT.COM (Doug Gibbons)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.astro,comp.dcom.modems,comp.misc,rec.ham-radio
Subject: Re: N.B.S. Time Service
Message-ID: <268@druin.ATT.COM>
Date: 8 Jun 88 15:55:26 GMT
References: <3335@phri.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO
Lines: 21

in article <3335@phri.UUCP>, roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) says:
> Xref: druin sci.electronics:1945 sci.astro:1124 comp.dcom.modems:1203 comp.misc:1702 rec.ham-radio:3315
> 
> glenn@otto.UUCP (Glenn Scott) writes:
>>   In addition, the "speed of light delay" via satellite shouldn't be much
>> different than the speed of light delay over a copper wire...
> wire, microwave, or fiber; in reality it's probably a combination of all
> three).  For a 3000 mile path at 300,000 miles/second, that's a 10 msec
> delay.



300,000 mi/sec???
When did this happen?
Nobody ever tells me anything.




					Doug Gibbons
					AT&T
					ihnp4!druin!ldg