Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!labrea!sri-unix!teknowledge-vaxc!wlieberm From: wlieberm@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (William Lieberman) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Biological relevance and AI (was Re: Who else isn't a science?) Message-ID: <23201@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> Date: 15 Jun 88 16:34:15 GMT References: <3c671fbe.44e6@apollo.uucp> <10510@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <13100@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <1988Jun14.140154.341@mntgfx.mentor.com> Reply-To: wlieberm@teknowledge-vaxc.UUCP (William Lieberman) Organization: Teknowledge, Inc., Palo Alto CA Lines: 26 Just to add slightly to Ben and Mike's discussion, Ben's naturally good question about why should it be that anyone can assume that we humans on earth uniquely possess capabilities in intellgence, etc. (i.e. the biological system that makes us up), and Mike's reply that such an assumption is not really made, reminds me of the question asked in a not-too-long ago earlier age when scientists asked, 'How likely is it that the chemistry of the world, as we know it, exists in the same state outside the earth?' A reasonable question. Then when helium was demonstrated to exist on the sun (through spectrographic analysis around the 1860's??) and around the same time when the table of the elements was being built up empirically and intuitively, the evidence favored the idea that our local chemical and physical laws were probably universal. As a youngster I used to wonder why chemists, etc. kept saying there are only around 100 or so elements in the universe. Why couldn't there be millions? But the data do suggest the chemists are correct - with relatively few elements, such is the matter of the universe existing. What I'm saying here is that it may be prudent to expect not too many diverse 'forms' of intelligence around. Rough analogy, I agree; but sometimes the history of science can provide useful guideposts. Right now we have some sensible ideas about what it takes to do certain kinds of analyses; but no one really knows what it takes to enable a state of consciousness to exist, for example. One answer surely lies in research in biophysics (and probably CS-AI). Bill Lieberman