Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!vanvleck!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!bungia!sialis!rjg From: rjg@sialis.mn.org (Robert J. Granvin) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: A Call For Votes [REPOST] Keywords: Send me your vote Message-ID: <568@sialis.mn.org> Date: 16 Jun 88 13:17:25 GMT References: <3189@tness7.UUCP> Reply-To: rjg@sialis.mn.org (Robert J. Granvin) Organization: Dr. Ho Laboratory and Day Care Center Lines: 37 In article <3189@tness7.UUCP> mechjgh@tness7.UUCP (Greg Hackney ) writes: > >This is a call for votes to elect the official Elm >Coordinator for future releases of Elm and bug fixes. >(David Taylor of HP has resigned from this position.) > >All readers of comp.mail.elm and users of Elm are >encouraged to vote. > >Please choose 1 name from the following list of people >who volunteered as a result of a call for volunteers >posted in comp.mail.elm: Whoa...! Wait a sec... It's entirely possible that I have missed some postings or items of importance in previous messages, but I personally will refuse to vote for anyone until I know something about the "candidates". What qualifications do each of these gentlemen have? How much time and effort will they be able to guarantee to the coordination of elm? Why should I vote for one and not another? Even if this has been hashed out in the past (faithful reader here, but not perfect :-), this type of information should still be included in the message requesting votes. My only criteria today is voting for someone whose name I like, or maybe because I like the company. Not good criteria for something of this nature... (No offense intended to the individuals involved... I'm sure they may all be qualified, but someone should still say why...) -- "I've been trying for some time to Robert J. Granvin develop a life-style that doesn't National Information Systems, Inc. require my presence." rjg@sialis.mn.org -Garry Trudeau ...{{amdahl,hpda}!bungia,rosevax}!sialis!rjg