Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watcgl!lily!jrmacmillan
From: jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem!
Summary: Let's use a PD crypt()
Keywords: crypt elm international
Message-ID: <4940@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 20 Jun 88 17:30:00 GMT
References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM>
Sender: daemon@watcgl.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan)
Organization: Anarchists' Society
Lines: 11

In article <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> edc@ALTOS.COM (Eric Christensen) writes:
|My suggestion is that we replace the crypt() calls with a public
|domain routine.  It won't be compatible with the crypt() routine, but
|I don't think that that will really be an issue. 

Sounds great to me.  Of course, I'm slightly biased, what with not
being able to use the US crypt() regardless :-)
--
John R. MacMillan
jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu		"I was _roasted_!!"
..!watmath!lily!jrmacmillan			-- M&Ms Peanut