Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!altnet!edc From: edc@ALTOS.COM (Eric Christensen) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem! Keywords: crypt elm international Message-ID: <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> Date: 20 Jun 88 08:30:29 GMT References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> Reply-To: edc@altnet.ALTOS.COM (Eric Christensen) Organization: Altos Computer Systems, San Jose, CA. Lines: 35 In article <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> mark@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG (Mark H. Colburn) writes: > >Hmmmm. The last time I looked, I thought that all versions of Unix >were supplied with a crypt command. It is just that there is one >version made for use in the U.S., and another which is distributed >abroad. Therefore there are crypt libraries on all systems, but they >may be incompatible. Is this correct? It is true that some UNIX vendors have a "quasi-crypt" that they supply to international customers, but many do not. You are correct that the quasi-crypt is incompatible with the real crypt, and this poses a big problem for elm. >This would still cause a problem if you were attempting to send >crypted mail to someone who has an incompatible crypt, so I support >Eric's idea of using a PD version of crypt rather than relying on the >potentially different versions of crypt that are distributed with the >system. I propese that we select a fairly stable PD crypt which we can build into the Elm sources. That way "Elm is Elm" no matter where you are. I am currently evaluating several crypts for this purpose. If anyone has any suggestions, or a favorite quasi-crypt function, I'd love to hear from you. I'll post my findings and proposal later this week. -- +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+ | Eric D. Christensen | Email: edc@altnet.altos.com (uunet!altnet!edc) | | Altos Computer Systems +---------------------------------------------------+ | 399 West Trimble Road | Definitions: Bug - An Undocumented Feature | | San Jose, Ca. 95131 | Feature - A Documented Bug | +-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+ | These views aren't Altos' - They're mine, all mine, and you can't have them | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+