Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!umd5!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!rafael From: rafael@proxftl.UUCP (Rafael Mayer) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Piracy Summary: Not quite illegal... Keywords: copy protection piracy Message-ID: <341@proxftl.UUCP> Date: 19 Jun 88 18:16:38 GMT References: <9160@cisunx.UUCP> <1801@uhccux.UUCP> <807@netxcom.UUCP> <5585@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> Organization: Proximity Technology, Ft. Lauderdale Lines: 42 In article <5585@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>, tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael Zehr) writes: > There's also a difference in kinds of piracy. If I copy 1-2-3 and put > it on 10 machines in an office, but only _one_ of them is actually > running the program at any one time, is that illegal? This really depends on what the 1-2-3 licensing agreement says. Some licensing agreements allow for only one back-up copy of the original software, others allow for more. Now that networks are becoming more common licensing agreements are becoming much more explicit. For instance here is a quote from the Microsoft 5.0 C compiler license agreement: "1. GRANT OF LICENSE. Microsoft grants you the right to use this copy of a Microsoft language compiler program (the "COMPILER") and to distribute your programs created using the COMPILER. You may not network the compiler or otherwise use it on more than one computer (i.e., a single CPU) at the same time. The COMPILER is owned by Microsoft and is protected by United States copyright laws and international treaty provisions. Therefore you must treat the COMPILER just like any other copyrighted material (e.g. a book or musical recording) except that (a) you may make one copy of the COMPILER solely for backup purposes, ..." One thing is clear, the agreement explicitly prevents you from executing the compiler on more than one cpu at a time, and you may only make one back-up copy of the compiler. So at most you could install the compiler on two machines. If you were careful about never using it at the same time on both machines, (i.e. you made a rule that the compiler can only be used on the machine that has all the manuals sitting next to it) you would not break the licensing agreement. (At least, I don't think so. I am no expert on these matters.) Disclaimer: My opinions are not those of my employer. +-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------+ | Rafael Mayer | NO ONE EXPECTS THE | | UUCP: {ihnp4!codas,allegra}!novavax!proxftl!rafael | SPANISH INQUISITION | |_____________________________________________________|_____________________| | Smooth ice | Friedrich | | Is paradise | Wilhelm | | For those who dance with expertise. | Nietzsche | +------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+