Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!tope
From: tope@enea.se (Tommy Petersson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Byte is rubbish - the Archimedes sure ain't !
Message-ID: <3504@enea.se>
Date: 15 Jun 88 08:10:00 GMT
References: <2398@csvax.liv.ac.uk> <3940@cbmvax.UUCP> <573@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: tope@enea.se (Tommy Petersson)
Organization: ENEA DATA AB, Sweden
Lines: 14
UUCP-Path: uunet!enea!tope

In article <573@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> vkr@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu (Vidhyanath K. Rao) writes:
>(Changing the subject quickly he said)
>I heard about a RISC chip that is (source? machine?) code compatible with
>the 68000. [No that is not the 88000]. What is the low down on that?
>If it is better than 68030, may be that is what should go into the Amiga 3000.




Maybe it's BASIC is compatible with Amiga BASIC :-)

A Reduced Instruction-Set chip machine-code compatible with a 68000 ??

Sounds weird!