Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bu-cs!kwe
From: kwe@bu-cs.BU.EDU (kwe@bu-it.bu.edu (Kent W. England))
Newsgroups: comp.sys.proteon
Subject: Re: RIP packets
Message-ID: <23440@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Date: 20 Jun 88 21:25:57 GMT
References: <8806172207.AA24364@WINDOM.UCAR.EDU> <8806201537.AA16176@devvax.TN.CORNELL.EDU>
Reply-To: kwe@buit13.bu.edu (Kent England)
Followup-To: comp.sys.proteon
Organization: Boston Univ. Information Tech. Dept.
Lines: 19

In article <8806201537.AA16176@devvax.TN.CORNELL.EDU> jch@DEVVAX.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Jeffrey C Honig) writes:
>>Is there a way to get rid of this unneccessary burden in the RIP
>>broadcasts?
>
>	enable send direct
>	disable send net
>
>Jeff

Should read "ENable SENDing STATic-routes".  However, "static" really
means directly connected networks in addition to statically configured
networks.  Proteon treats them as the same and calls them "static".

Trivial point, but I stumbled over it in the beginning.

I think this will do what you want, unless you have some statically
configured nets in there.  Good advice.

	Kent England, Boston U