Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!husc6!bloom-beacon!latlog.UUCP!PAYNE
From: PAYNE@latlog.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: MALLOC_0_RETURNS_NULL
Message-ID: <104.8806170745@latlog.co.uk>
Date: 17 Jun 88 09:45:31 GMT
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 7

Is there any reason why this exists and why it is not defined?

Having spent two days tracking this down it is very frustrating to find
that this non-standard behaviour is the reason. Is this feature documented
anywhere? If it is not (and I couldn't find it) it certainly ought to be?

Julian Payne, European Silicon Structures (ES2)
(payne@latlog.uucp)