Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!mejac!gryphon!anb02!cherry From: cherry@anb02.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Phil Katz (PKARC author) sued b Summary: Software patents Message-ID: <519@anb02.CTS.COM> Date: 30 Jun 88 01:47:16 GMT References: <151@kadsma.kadsm> <2000002@cpe> <974@flatline.UUCP> Reply-To: cherry@anb02.CTS.COM (R._Cherry) Organization: Airwavz National Broadcasting Inc. Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 31 It is possible to patent an algorithm and software. I recently received letters of patent on a fluid multi-deminsional relational database. The patent included several 'claims' and also included illustrations describing its operation. I was lucky enough to get a VERY GOOD patent attorney who helped me write the description. You may patent processes (physical, chemical, numerical, ...) and true 'inventions' which are novel and have a true purpose. It helps if you can provide a sample of the intended application but, be careful not to limit your invention to the example. Patents are a lot of fun. I've got quite a collection but, the writeup and presentation have more to do with receiving a patent than just the concept. It can be done but, its a lot more difficult to patent software than it is hardware. Its interesting to note that patented software is better protected than patented hardware. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- B.C. & Zot _ /| PUP/GV + Cherry.STCWR \`o_O' XNS + Cherry:STCWR:Xerox =( )= Aachk! Phfut! ARPA - rocksanne!anb02!cherry%cs.rochester.EDU U + rocksanne!bob + cherry.stcwr@Xerox.COM - cherry%anb02.CTS.COM - anb02!cherry%gryphon.CTS.COM UUCP + rocksanne!bob + = work, - = home - {rocksanne | gryphon | wright}!anb02!cherry ----------------------------------------------------------------------------