Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: 0x47e+barney not considered C
Message-ID: <11446@steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 1 Jul 88 15:41:34 GMT
References: <120200001@hcx2> <8194@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 18

In article <8194@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:

| NO!  X3J11 will be entitled to ignore such comments from anyone other
| than the original second-round commentor, since it has requested that
| comments in the third formal public review be limited to remarks on
| substantive CHANGES made as a result of the second public review.
| (Of course, if the third public review document is really being
| sent out without accompanying Rationale, as someone reported, it is
| possible that the cover letter containing this restriction got left
| out too.)

  Regardless of what X3J11 is entitled to do, it would be foolish to let
a mistake like this go through. "entitled to ignore" seems to be a
poorly chosen way of putting it.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me