Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!moriarty
From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Technical word processing
Message-ID: <4277@fluke.COM>
Date: 1 Jul 88 17:42:27 GMT
References: <985@actnyc.UUCP>
Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM
Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 18

In article <985@actnyc.UUCP> rmf@actnyc.UUCP (Robert M. Fuhrer) writes:
>Incidentally, can anyone with FWP/Word experience confirm Jeff Meyer's
>assessment in a previous posting of FWP's better handling of graphics and
>Word's better handling of tables?  Since my target is technical documents,
>it seems that FWP would do better if that was the case (I expect I will
>end up using more graphics than tables)...

Remember, that was a preview of Word *4.0*, not 3.02; 4.0 will probably not
be out until September or October.

                                 If men could get pregnant, abortion would
                                 be a sacrament.
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
<*> DISCLAIMER: Do what you want with me, but leave my employers alone! <*>