Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:7924 comp.windows.misc:585
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watcgl!lrbartram
From: lrbartram@watcgl.waterloo.edu (lyn bartram)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Textedit wars (was  vi vs emacs in a student environment)
Message-ID: <5071@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 3 Jul 88 15:32:07 GMT
References: <399@cantuar.UUCP> <11418@steinmetz.ge.com> <6056@megaron.arizona.edu> <8196@brl-smoke.ARPA> <4736@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Reply-To: lrbartram@watcgl.waterloo.edu (lyn bartram)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 18

In article <4736@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> barnett@steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett) writes:
>Actually, I use textedit a lot. It has several things going for it.
>Also, textedit is MUCH more powerful than it seems at first glance.
>
>For instance, I can click on the entire file (four quick clicks), and
>press one function key. 
>
>The power of the pending delete, secondary selection, and multiple
>clicking provides a very powerful set of accerators.
>
>Let's say I wanted to swap the contents of two buffers or files.
>This can be done by:
>
>	Hold down Control and quad-click with the left mouse

	...etc.   *Quad* clock?  4 quick clicks?  Why 4?  if there are any
	other multiple clicks ( double, even single ) i can just imagine
	the ease of making errors.