Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:11383 comp.arch:5550
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!pardo
From: pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Programmed code generation: Native vs. Pcode
Message-ID: <5314@june.cs.washington.edu>
Date: 17 Jul 88 22:11:58 GMT
References: <3353@cognos.UUCP> <619@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <429@uwovax.uwo.ca> <12381@ut-sally.UUCP> <1108@ficc.UUCP> <23944@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <5308@june.cs.washington.edu> <23955@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: pardo@uw-june.UUCP (David Keppel)
Organization: U of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle
Lines: 10

bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) writes:
>pardo writes:
>>[ Most lisps don't generate their own machine code on the fly ]
>[ many examples to the contrary ]

Ok, how's this for a sweeping generalization:  I'm dead wrong.
Sorry, guys, but I do sometimes clutter the net needlessly.
I apologize for my disinformation.

    ;-D on  ( Oooh, did I just break netiquette, apologizing ?-)  Pardo