Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!sri-unix!garth!smryan
From: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: CRAY vs. caching & VM
Message-ID: <1069@garth.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jul 88 22:32:05 GMT
References: <4232@cbmvax.UUCP> <76700035@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <5342@june.cs.washington.edu> <60952@sun.uucp> <14493@apple.Apple.COM>
Reply-To: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Organization: INTERGRAPH (APD) -- Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 4

>                         The CRAY is statically scheduled; compilers and
>humans spend a LOT of time optimizing the order of instructions to tweak every

This is also done on a 205--the possibilty of faults is simply ignored.