Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!jesup From: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: using (ugh! yetch!) assembler Message-ID: <4365@cbmvax.UUCP> Date: 29 Jul 88 01:37:55 GMT References: <6341@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <60859@sun.uucp> <474@m3.mfci.UUCP> <37014@linus.UUCP> <2948@utastro.UUCP> Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup) Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 17 In article <2948@utastro.UUCP> nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) writes: >In article <37014@linus.UUCP>, munck@linus.UUCP (Robert Munck) writes: >> If I've got two years and five people to write a system that takes >> 100,000 lines of Ada [...] >Our models of what constitutes a program are clearly very different. Given >two years and five people to write 100,000 lines of Ada, I'd find some other >profession. I'm astounded that it can be done at all, and I would *never* >propose it be written in assembler. How about 8-10 months, 4 people, and 40-50,000 lines of Ada? It can be done, I've seen it (it was even a government contract). And that was while supporting the prototype written in a couple of months in C by 2 people. -- Randell Jesup, Commodore Engineering {uunet|rutgers|allegra}!cbmvax!jesup