Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:11453 comp.sys.ibm.pc:17377 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!nic.MR.NET!umn-cs!hall!pai!erc From: erc@pai.UUCP (Eric Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Bug list for Microsoft C Summary: Results for HP-UX and MSC Message-ID: <190@pai.UUCP> Date: 20 Jul 88 13:44:03 GMT References: <4516@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <372@scolex> Organization: Prime Automation, Inc., Burnsville, MN Lines: 50 [...] In article <372@scolex>, seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan) writes: > In article <4516@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> iverson@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Tim Iverson) writes: > >int i=1, j=33; > > > >main() { > > printf("%x\n", 1<<33); > > printf("%x\n", 1>>33); > > printf("%x\n", i< > printf("%x\n", i>>j); > >} > >What results do you get? (This might even be interesting on non 86 machines; > >oh boy, I just checked a non 86, and it failed too.) > > >Mike Stump, Cal State Univ, Northridge Comp Sci Department > >aeusemrs@csuna.csun.edu > > ---------------- > Sean Eric Fagan > seanf@sco My results: HP-UX [1] MS-DOS [2] 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 [1] Hewlett-Packard 320 workstation, running HP-UX 5.5. [2] Microsoft C 4.0, DOS 3.1. What are the correct results? (I assume MSC is wrong, but I'm not sure about the HP). And anyway, back to the original purpose of the posting: could someone email me, or post, a copy of the MSC bug list? I'm interested to know what to expect from the compiler. I've already come across what I think are bugs, especially in the malloc/free routines (I seem to lose RAM as the program runs), but it would be nice to know I'm not the only one hitting those problems. Thanks, -Eric -- Eric F. Johnson | Phone +1 612-894-0313 | Are we Prime Automation,Inc | UUCP: bungia!pai!erc | having 12201 Wood Lake Drive | UUCP: sun!tundra!pai!erc | fun Burnsville, MN 55337 USA | BIX: erc | yet?