Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!kth!luth!eru.mt.luth.se!sow
From: sow@eru.mt.luth.se (Sven-Ove Westberg)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Crypt() in Elm - This may be a problem!
Message-ID: <1151@luth.luth.se>
Date: 20 Jul 88 12:42:20 GMT
References: <470@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <278@clout.Jhereg.MN.ORG> <485@altnet.ALTOS.COM> <10291@ncc.Nexus.CA> <1095@luth.luth.se> <5135@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Sender: news@sm.luth.se
Reply-To: Sven-Ove Westberg <sow@eru.luth.se>
Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines: 16
UUCP-Path: {uunet,mcvax}!enea!eru.luth.se!sow

In article <5135@watcgl.waterloo.edu> jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan) writes:
|In article <1095@luth.luth.se> Sven-Ove Westberg <sow@cad.luth.se> writes:
||
||Address parsing is NOT a matter for the UA either.
|
|I beg to differ; how does Elm know who to reply to if it can't parse
|addresses?

It understands the structure of the header, thats all a UA has to know.
Then it send it all to the TA.

Sven-Ove Westberg, CAD, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden.
UUCP:    {uunet,mcvax}!enea!cad.luth.se!sow
ARPA:    sow%cad.luth.se@ucbvax.berkeley.edu  (only dumb ARPA mailers)
Internet: sow@cad.luth.se
Bitnet:  sow%cad.luth.se@sekth