Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!agate!fester@math.berkeley.edu From: fester@math.berkeley.edu Newsgroups: comp.society.women Subject: Countering discrimination your children will face Message-ID: <12502@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 25 Jul 88 01:52:51 GMT References: <12003@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Math Dept., UC Berkeley Lines: 31 Approved: skyler@violet.berkeley.edu (Moderator -- Trish Roberts) Comments-to: comp-women-request@cs.purdue.edu Submissions-to: comp-women@cs.purdue.edu In article <12003@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> ix665%sdcc6@ucsd.edu (Sue Raul) writes: >, discrimination doesn't start or end with whether there's a >computer in the little girl's life or not - it may not be in a little >boy's either, as is true for hundreds of other items. The least a parent >may want to think about is, within their budget, allow exposure to >all sides of "being human" - [followed by a good list of various kinds of stimuli for children] Just one point - playing neutral in a negative context isn't going to result in equality. In other words, parents concerned about giving their children equal opportunity in the world need to *actively* attempt to balance out the ways in which their children will be discriminated against by educational/religious/whatever-else-applies institutions. Otherwise external socialization, which is much more powerful than upbringing, will just run its course. Thus while daughters should feel free to choose humanities as well as technical or scientific studies, and whereas a variety of opportunities ought be made available to all children when possible, *encouraging* girl children towards the sciences (up to a point) is a minor measure to help counteract the discouragement they may well be getting outside the home. Being strictly neutral lets standard socialization have the upper hand. Lea Fester fester@math.berkeley.edu [Note that this is especially easy in regard to computers--there are lots of "computers" on the market as childrens' toys. TR]