Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!gorodish!guy From: guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Valid Numbers (was Re: 0x47e+barney not considered C) Message-ID: <61731@sun.uucp> Date: 27 Jul 88 23:32:46 GMT References: <1988Jul6.142014.6116@sq.uucp> <283@sdti.UUCP> <295@pcsbst.UUCP> Sender: news@sun.uucp Lines: 5 > Second, even if the number were octal, 8's and 9's (probably not such a good > idea) are legal At least according to the January 11, 1988 draft, 8's and 9's are *not* legal in octal numbers; check 3.1.3.2 Integer constants.