Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!oddjob!ncar!ames!killer!tness7!tness1!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Amiga Dealers/Commodore
Message-ID: <2353@sugar.uu.net>
Date: 28 Jul 88 01:42:52 GMT
References: <4322@cbmvax.UUCP> <1209@flatline.UUCP>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston, TX
Lines: 12

In article <1209@flatline.UUCP>, erict@flatline.UUCP (j eric townsend) writes:
> Oh yeah, don't forget the cocoIII running OS9 Level II.  CBM should
> have gone with OS9 or an OS9 variant  (in my opnion).  At least
> OS9 has fork(). :-) :-)

OS/9 doesn't have fork(). This is why OS/9 can run on small 68000 based
systems with no MMU, like the Amiga, and UNIX can't.
-- 
Peter da Silva  `-_-'  peter@sugar.uu.net  "You made a TIME MACHINE out of a
 Have you hugged  U  your wolf today?        VOLKSWAGEN?"
"Well, I couldn't afford a deLorean. It's a bit of a pain trying to get it
 up to 88 miles an hour though."