Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!cod!rupp From: rupp@cod.NOSC.MIL (William L. rupp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Thoughts on //gs Sales Message-ID: <1164@cod.NOSC.MIL> Date: 20 Jul 88 17:08:26 GMT References: <8807081916.AA13489@crash.cts.com> Reply-To: rupp@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (William L. rupp) Organization: Computer Sciences Corp., San Diego Lines: 35 I wonder whether the many Apple II users who have gripped about the Apple II not being able to run UNIX, not having enough this or that, etc., have ever run a business. The facts, as I see it, are these: a. Apple Computer, Inc. owes nothing to users except a reliable product that does what they claim it will. If some people would like the GS to have been a better machine, that's tough. Sure, it would be nice if the GS had a 10Mhz clock speed and a faster windowing interface, but being "nice" does not equate to an obligation on Apple's part. b. The Apple II line has been a huge success, but it has been surpassed technically by the latest models both from Apple as well as from other companies. Even Henry Ford had to replace the Model T eventually. There is only so much improvement that can be made in the Apple IIGS without spending unwarranted amounts of resources that would be better spent, in the long run, in Apple's most up-to-date product line. In other words, even if massive improvements in the IIGS could be made, it would be silly for Apple to allocate money to do so. Apple's future, immediate future, at any rate, lies with the Mac. When will Apple stop making Apple IIs? As soon as they can, is my guess. That means as soon as the II line experiences a significant decline in sales. I think that will not happen for a couple of years, but the end of the II line cannot be very many years away. For now, I imagine the top Apple people see theII as a continuing source of revenue which is better kept going. But if the time ever comes when Apple announces *no* new improvements or related products for the IIs over a period of six months to a year, I would expect the end to be not far off. I believe GM stopped development of the Corvair in 1966, but continued to make them till the end of the 1969 model year. That three year period between a halt in development and termination of production would probably be shorter for a microcomputer, say 18 months. It was nice while it lasted. Bill