Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!crash!maddie
From: maddie@crash.cts.com (Tom Schenck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Thoughts about the rumored gs+
Summary: See also "If the gs really meant business..."
Message-ID: <3246@crash.cts.com>
Date: 26 Jul 88 15:25:30 GMT
References: <8807182116.aa05050@SPARK.BRL.ARPA> <1260001@hpclkms.HP.COM>
Reply-To: maddie@crash.CTS.COM (Tom Schenck)
Organization: Crash TS, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 22

In article <1260001@hpclkms.HP.COM> ken@hpclkms.HP.COM (Kenneth Sumrall) writes:
>/ hpclkms:comp.sys.apple / oliver@thelink.UUCP (Joel Sumner) /  2:51 pm  Jul 20, 1988 /
>>In article <8807182116.aa05050@SPARK.BRL.ARPA> Asaf Sokolowski writes:
>>                                      SE  *            //gs+
>>speed in MHz (standard)               7.x              7.x
>
>Excuse me but isn't comparison of Mhz speeds between a 32-bit 68000 and a
							^^^^^^^^^^^^
>16-bit 65SC816 kinda like comparing Apples to Oranges (no pun intended)

   The 68000 is only SIMULATING a 32-bit processor. In actuallity, it is really
   a 16-bit processor.

Tom Schenck, Member 52nd St Development Team
-- 

UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!maddie
ARPA: crash!pnet01!maddie@nosc.mil
INET: maddie@pnet01.CTS.COM

Disclaimer : The only company who's thoughts are my own is owned by me.

Tom Schenck, member 52nd Street Development Team.