Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!think!ames!mailrus!uwmcsd1!lakesys!jason
From: jason@lakesys.UUCP (Jason)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: A last shot at the future of the Apple II
Summary: As a sidenote...
Message-ID: <904@lakesys.UUCP>
Date: 27 Jul 88 20:03:48 GMT
References: <1172@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Organization: Lake Systems, Milwaukee Wisconsin
Lines: 21

In article <1172@cod.NOSC.MIL>, rupp@cod.NOSC.MIL (William L. rupp) writes:
> 
> of much more powerful applications than the 64 K of the Apple II.  And,
> as much as I joke about MS-DOG, I mean DOS, it is far superior to DOS
> 3.3 or ProDOS.  Come on, ProDOS doesn't even have a 'type' or 'more'
> command the last time I looked.

	Uh, ProDOS doesn't have ANY "commands." BASIC.SYSTEM's simple CLI
has some commands, not including 'type' or 'more'. However, because of it's
expandability, people have written type (haven't seen a more, tho') for it.
Aside from that, there are other command shells which have 'type' built-in (I
should probably write 'more' just to be spiteful :), amongst other things.

	I realize that this is being pretty nit-picky, but the mistake you
made is fairly common (mistaking the BI's abilities for that of PD's).

> Bill

-- 

Jason - Not your average iconoclast  |	UUCP: uwvax!uwmcsd1!lakesys!jason