Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Thoughts about the rumored gs+
Message-ID: <8257@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 29 Jul 88 03:18:11 GMT
References: <8807182116.aa05050@SPARK.BRL.ARPA>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <8807182116.aa05050@SPARK.BRL.ARPA> FNSOKO@WEIZMANN.BITNET (Asaf Sokolowski) writes:
>... ,however, this machine could hurt the SE - don't you think.

NO!  That's the line of thinking that has been killing Apple II progress
at Apple.  The IIGS and the SE address considerably different audiences.
Mostly, such a choice is going top be motivated by support for desired
software packages.  The IIGS and the SE have little application software
in common, so the choice will be pretty straightforward.  (Actually
other computer brands need to be factored in too; the IBM PC is more of
a Mac competitor than is the IIGS.)